Using performance results, we can compare these two cards.
This is the comparation radar graph of Oberthur ID-ONE Cosmo 64 RSA v5.4 and Feitian JavaCOS 3.0.4 e2.
The values closer to 100% represent the times close to the fastest result among all tested cards, whereas values close to 10% suggest slower performance in the corresponding algorithm. Value of 0%(NS) indicates a lack of support or occurrence of unexpected error during the tested algorithm.
| Support | Oberthur ID-ONE Cosmo 64 RSA v5.4 | Feitian JavaCOS 3.0.4 e2 |
|---|---|---|
| ALG_SHA_256 MessageDigest_doFinal() | No | Yes |
| TYPE_AES LENGTH_AES_128 ALG_AES_BLOCK_128_CBC_NOPAD Cipher_doFinal() | No | Yes |
| TYPE_AES LENGTH_AES_256 ALG_AES_BLOCK_128_CBC_NOPAD Cipher_doFinal() | No | Yes |
| TYPE_AES LENGTH_AES_128 setKey() | No | Yes |
| TYPE_AES LENGTH_AES_256 setKey() | No | Yes |
| TYPE_RSA_CRT_PRIVATE LENGTH_RSA_1024 ALG_RSA_NOPAD Cipher_doFinal() | Yes | No |
| TYPE_RSA_CRT_PUBLIC LENGTH_RSA_1024 ALG_RSA_NOPAD Cipher_doFinal() | Yes | No |
| TYPE_RSA_CRT_PRIVATE LENGTH_RSA_2048 ALG_RSA_NOPAD Cipher_doFinal() | Yes | No |
| TYPE_RSA_CRT_PUBLIC LENGTH_RSA_2048 ALG_RSA_NOPAD Cipher_doFinal() | Yes | No |
| TYPE_RSA_PRIVATE LENGTH_RSA_1024 ALG_RSA_NOPAD Cipher_doFinal() | Yes | No |
| TYPE_RSA_PUBLIC LENGTH_RSA_1024 ALG_RSA_NOPAD Cipher_doFinal() | Yes | No |
| TYPE_RSA_PRIVATE LENGTH_RSA_2048 ALG_RSA_NOPAD Cipher_doFinal() | Yes | No |
| TYPE_RSA_PUBLIC LENGTH_RSA_2048 ALG_RSA_NOPAD Cipher_doFinal() | Yes | No |